SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
AND
THE GUYANESE AMERINDIANS
17th January 2001
C. Bates
Environmental Problems and Policies
Tutor: C. House
This essay attempts to highlight the plight of the
Guyanese Amerindians as the Guyanese government and Non-Governmental
Organizations implement policies for sustainable development in the
region. Apparently those policies are not benefitting the indigenous
community and appears that they are destined to go the way of
countless other primal societies when faced with a development
strategy designed to facilitate the enhancement of consumerism.
Their only options appear to be the object of eco-tourist attraction,
relegation to the rank and file of the labouring masses, whose
salaries could never purchase the freedom and integrity they once had
as autonomous communities, or confront the government concerning
their priorities. Currently they are somewhere between doing all of
the above.
The Co-operative Republic of Guyana, formerly British
Guyana, is on the North eastern coast of South America, bordered by
Venezuela to the east, the Atlantic coast to the North, Suriname
(formerly Dutch Guyana) to the west, and Brazil to the south. It's
total land mass is approximately 84,000 square miles of some of the
world's most biologically diverse tropical rainforest and savanna
lands, populated by only 800,000 people; roughly 10 persons per
square mile the majority of whom live near the coast. In comparison
to Britain's land mass of 94,251 sq.mls., populated at 59,251,000; or
627.3 persons per sq.ml.(Britannica:a) About 51% of the Guyanese
population is of East Indian descent, their ancestors having
immigrated mainly from the state of Madras as indentured labourers
during the abolition of slavery. The descendents of the freed African
slaves now number about 35% of the population, persons of mixed race
make up 7%, Portuguese, other white skinned immigrants and
ex-colonials of Spanish, Dutch, and British origin, along with
immigrant Chinese number about 0.4% Amerindians comprise around
6%.(Britannica:b)
There are many distinctly different Amerindian tribes,
comprising any when between 50 to 1000 members each.(SDNP,1999:a) The
most widely known and understood are the famous warlike Caribs whose
teenagers were traditionally obligated to migrate throughout Amazonia
and beyond to fresh bio-zones as soon as they were skilled in
self-sufficiency. Their widespread settlement and aggressive
behaviour made them the predominant gene pool in the early
settlement of the Caribbean Islands which are named after
them.*(About 2,700 Caribs remain.) The Arawaks *(Pop.15,000) were
also familiar to early settlers as they usually lived along the
coastal swamp reaches. The Warrau *(Pop.4,700), Wapisiani
*(Pop.6,000), Arecuna *(Pop.475), Makusi *(Pop.7,000), and others of
similar numbers preferred the rainforests and savannas inland though
all were originally migratory with estimates of their first
inhabiting the region over 12,000 years ago. (SDNP:b)
The majority of the general population are employed in
the sugar-cane and rice growing industries or engaged in commerce in
the national capital, Georgetown, on the banks of another vast
Amazonian river; the Demerara, (a name we all associate with brown
sugar) struggling to contend with their colonial inheritance as one
of the world's poorest nations, with social-democratic ideals and a
distinctly Guyanese eccentricity. The jungle literally surrounds the
city, permeating it in some parts.
Apart from a bauxite mining town, Linden, further
inland, and several workers settlements surrounding foreign gold
mining operations and government outposts, there is little more to
show in terms of industry and development though exploratory
drilling for petroleum off the coast has recently begun.The country
is known to have large resources of minerals, including precious
metals and land-locked petroleum reserves, but it has a poor
transport infrastructure and given the nature of the predominantly
black market economy, the huge outlays for investment companies have
limited their extraction. Some might consider this might a Godsend
for the native population, but not the Amerindians themselves.
As early as 1925 deteriorating social standards among
the indigenous people Were noted by exploratory
ethnobioligists.(Henfry,T:a) Some of the earliest colonial
exploitation was in Balata, the sap derived from a tree of the same
name, used primarily in the manufacture of rubber before the
invention of more synthetic petroleum based compounds. With the
employment of native people on the Balata
plantations and their concurrent introduction to a cash based
economy,came a decline in indigenous social standards resulting in
alcohol abuse, domestic violence, lower hygiene standards and
increased sickness, and the loss of traditional knowledge of the
natural environment, particularly regarding the use of medicinal
herbs and swidden farming methods. Other early indications of
European encroachment were the establishment of a 5000 sq.ml.
government owned cattle ranch on the savannas, which made no
provision for native people to graze their own cattle, and the
influx off prospectors searching for 'Eldorado'. The latter brought
further disease and degradation for which the innocent Amerindian
mind was ill equipped.
Diseases foreign to the indigenous metabolism, which has
also became more susceptible to disease. Sore-eyes, nausea,
diarrhea, and hypertension are prevalent in areas where mining takes
place.(SDNP:c) Diseases such as malaria and parasite infestation were
normally surmountable by healthy individuals and native remedies, but
now take their toll in significantly greater numbers. Conditions
conducive to their spread are enhanced by mining practices which
block natural water courses creating stagnant pools and the
infiltration of unsanitary effluent and sewerage from miners
encampments into traditional sources of drinking water. (Guiana
Shield:a.) Present day gold mining techniques which require the use
of compounds containing cyanide are the norm in large multi-national
firms. Huge spills of waste chemicals have been reported as well as
the ongoing, unavoidable
leakages consequent with everyday mining activities, polluting
groundwater and tributaries to the detriment of aquatic life. Native
people who rely upon fish to supplement their diet and drinking water
from polluted courses have no option but to remain where they are due
to restrictive land rights policies.
These problems may not affect mining workers as they are
able to buy imported, bottled water and tinned food, but villages
downstream and in neighbouring areas supplied by tributaries or
contaminated groundwater suffer the consequences. Indiscriminate
forestry is another culprit in the disregard for true sustainability,
blocking streams with dirt and vegetative matter eutrophying the
water courses, driving game further away from the restricted
settlements. Furthermore, habitats are lost through division by clear
felling and as islands of vegetation are created making it difficult
for choice species to migrate as they are fearful of or unable to
traverse open ground.(Henfry,T.:b) The indigenous farming and
hunting culture is being abandoned in these respects as the men-folk
seek employment with firms active in the area.
The new generations are becoming increasingly
disillusioned with their native ways and mothers are left to struggle
with the maintenance of the village community and management of food
crops, as well as taking over the roles of the men who traditionally
governed by council. (SDNP:e) The men are often not seen for long
periods of time and with inflationary black market prices on processed
foodstuff, can ill afford to maintain their families on the salaries
they receive as unskilled workers. Malnutrition is prevalent in some
remote villages. Teenagers are leaving the villages in their elders
footsteps, with many young girls joining the ranks of prostitutes
serving the workers who may be away from home for months at a time.
Some are never seen again. A large proportion of the gainfully
employed workers are desperate men, living fast and dying young with
a make or break get rich quick mentality, often inspired by the
Hollywood movies shown regularly in remote community halls by the
light of a diesel generator.(Bates.C. 2001)
The Guyanese government is operating under the weight of
almost one billion dollars of foreign aid received primarily from the
American government. The latter also provide them with all their
wheat grain and regularly provide leadership in development projects,
dictating the ways in which investment is spent.(Britannica:c) In
1996, the U.S. Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs published a
paper for prospective investors in the region citing the
difficulties in getting land deed titles, saying, ' ...those who seek
to tap into Guyana's vast potential should be prepared for the
challenges' because '[w]hile there is no screening of investment, the
centralized process of decision making and its lack of transparency
can result in delays and frustration for foreign investors.'
(Britannica:d) The truth of this is certainly not due to the
governments considerations for the rights of indigenous people, but
is more likely a reflection of the way such matters are organized
amongst the national private interest groups who are determined to
get as much of any inward investment as possible.
Officially, they have granted a mere 6000 sq.mls. of
land titles to native people, whereas recently a five million acre
exploratory lease was granted to a Canadian mining firm;(Guyana
Shield:b) All of the large scale mining and forestry operations are
owned by foreign, multi-national companies. These are creating
stress on the fabric of indigenous culture and the government is slow
to listen to the organized efforts of native people for
recognition,(SDNP:f) mainly due to harsh economic realities but also
because of long standing attitudes toward native people, who have
traditionally been regarded with some suspicion and even
superstitious fear. Instead, a collection of N.G.O.s is entrusted
with the task, perhaps in the hope that they will aid the
smooth transition of native people from self-sufficiency and
inter-dependence within the natural environment to dependence upon
the global cash economy.
Numerous national and international N.G.Os operate in
Guyana (Henfry.T:c), some are apparently self-determined, others are
more directly linked to the National Ministry for Amerindian Affairs.
In May 2000, the United Nations spear headed the formation of the
Millennium Forum consisting of over one thousand NGOs, ,...with a
strong track record in global issue areas.' ' ...to meet the
challenges and needs of the world community in the 21st
century.' as the '...representative of the global
nature of society..." (United Nations,2000) Apparently this is
an endeavour to make NGOs more accountable. The United Nations
Development Program has been in operation in Guyana since 1998 and
has thoroughly researched the Amerindian situation with regard to
national government policy and its Structural Adjustment Program,
having also '...attached an Associate Expert on Indigenous People to
the Ministry of Amerindian Affairs.'(SDNP:g)
In 1999 the government organized a convention between
itself and tribal leaders in order to collate first-hand accounts of
the Amerindian situation, whilst giving the leaders a chance to
express their concerns. Protests have been heard since the convention
as concerns, and ideas on how to address them put forward by tribal
leaders, appear to have fallen on deaf ears. Understandably, given
Amerindian ignorance concerning the organization of modern
government, concerns and agendas will clash. The Pan Tribal
Confederacy of Amerindian Tribal Nations, formed in response to
increased feelings of tribal impotence in the face of government
pressure, demands that they should be recognized as having the
inextricable right to determine their own destiny. They seek the
freedom to operate as equals in accordance with own culture. Tribal
leaders are not naive concerning so-called non-governmental
assistance; in the words the ceremonial chief of the confederacy,
Damon Corrie(2001), '...the NGO's are in the Government's back pocket
and speak volumes without actually accomplishing anything significant
for the Amerindians.'
One project of interest to all parties might be the
Iwokrama International Forest Program.(2001) Initiated by the UNDP,
it is involved in a range of projects such as forest zoning, road
management, carbon sequestration, wildlife inventory and management,
non-timber related products, remote sensing, bio-diversity inventory
and bio-prospecting. One of its key initiatives the organizing of a
group of thirteen village groups fortunate enough to live in and
around the program environment into a self-governing 'Development
Board.' They are considered stake holders in the program, by
providing local knowledge which must be adhered to by the program in
fulfilling its criteria.
The problem with such seemingly altruistic examples is
that the donors and supportive NGOs of this project also invest
energy and capital in ventures clearly designed to bring the overall
society up to competency within a global competitive
market;(CIDA,2000) The resultant systematization, however, cannot
benefit the Amerindian people UNLESS they give up their
indigenous ideology. Given that they have had almost five hundred
years to make the transition and have barely attempted to do so as
yet, there is little hope that they will successfully achieve this in
the time allowed by technocratic globalization.
As globalization comes into effect the large developed
nations are attempting to ensure that under developed nations have
the ability to include their resources in the international
marketplace. The resulting effect is countries are being run ever
more like commercial enterprises, with their governments as the Board
of Directors. Unfortunately, with new skills required for the
expansion and maintenance of infrastructure, the contribution
indigenous people are able to make regarding the sustainability of these
developments is often overlooked. Considering that for a very long
time the Amerindians have happily and conscientiously lived closer to
the environment than the policy makers, surely their concerns warrant
far more immediate consideration or else what are the governments
and concerned NGOs trying to sustain?
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bates, C. 2000. ( Author visited Rupununi region as a child
whilst uncle was manager of Dadanawa.)
see GUIANA SHIELD/Report #6.
Britannica:a, 2000. WWW.britannica.com, SEARCH / U.K.
Britannica:b, 2000. WWW.britannica.com, SEARCH / Guyana
Britannica:c, 2000. WWW.britannica.com, Guyana / Statistics
Britannica:d, 2000. WWW.britannica.com, SEARCH / U.S. Embassy
/ Georgetown / Guyana / ( Report by Bureau of Economy & Business Affairs.) 1996
CIDA, 2000. ( Canadian International Development Agency).
WWW.acdi-cida.gc.ca/index-e.htm CIDA Around the World/ Americas /Guyana/
Corrie, D. 2001. damoncorrie@yahoo.com / www.pantribalconfederacy.com
(Letter to author)
Guiana Shield:a, 1999. WWW.gsmp.org/ WELCOME / Conflict & Solutions
Guiana Shield:b, 1999 WWW.gsmp.org/ RUPUNUNI / Reports # 4
Henfry,T:a (Date Unknown) ( Research Fellow/ Kent Uni.)
http://lucy.ukc.ac.uk/Sonja/RF/Divdocs/Hen/proxframes.html#Sec21.4
MSN. SEARCH/ Ethnobiology and Conservation in Guyana
1.1.5 Outside Influences; Cattle, Mining, and the cash economy.
Henfry,T:b Outside influences; Cattle, Mining, and the cash economy.
Henfry,T:c 1.1 Amerindians in Guyana.
Iwokrama International Rainforests Program, 2001. WWW.iwokrama.org
Current Research and Services.
SDNP:a,1999. (Sustainable Development Network Program)(NGO)
WWW.sdnp.org.gy UNDP Guyana, / United Nations Development Program:
Guyana; National Report on Indigenous Peoples And Development.
Vereeke. J, Mr. ( Associate expert on indigenous people).1994
SDNP:b, 1999. The Indigenous People of Guyana: Indicators and Profile.
SDNP:c, 1999. Amerindian living Conditions Per. Region.
SDNP:d, 1999. Opportunity Profiles : Mining.
SDNP:e, 1999. The Indigenous People of Guyana: Indicators and Profile.
SDNP:f, 1999. Recent Development. ( Amirang).
SDNP:g, 1999. Recent Development.
United Nations, 2000. WWW.milleniumforum.org/ Organisation and Structure.
|